Not Logged In Log In   Sign Up   Points Leaders
Follow Us    4:57 AM

Message Forum - Read Message

Category: All Things Ethanol > Topics Add to favorite topics   Post new topicPost New Topic
Author Topic: Entering the courtroom: ethanol Topic is locked Back to Topics
llmike007

Rookie Author
San Bernardino

Posts:80
Points:1,636,410
Joined:Sep 2007
Message Posted: Dec 30, 2008 11:48:49 PM

On a recent episode of "The People's Court," a lady sued a mechanic over an issue about her car's "check engine" light. I didn't happen to watch the whole thing, but I assume that she probably sued him because the light kept turning on even after he "fixed" it. Whatever the issue was, Judge Milian ruled in favor of the defendant.

As is typical with "TPC," the defendant was asked what he thought of the verdict. I was appalled with his response: "I blame the gasoline companies. They're putting too much alcohol in the gas, and it's throwing off the computer."

We've been talking about what constitutes a suitable amount of ethanol in gas for the longest time on this forum. Is ethanol a possible suspect here?
REPLIES (newest first)
Profile Pic
PbFootNY
Champion Author New York

Posts:7,934
Points:1,539,660
Joined:Nov 2008
Message Posted: Jan 5, 2009 11:57:14 PM

As much as I hate ethanol, I've never had it cause a "Check Engine" condition. The computer in my '89 never had a problem with it.

The lady in the story probably had an emissions problem that the mechanic just kept clearing out with a scan tool.

Gas mileage is a different story. I call don't call it E10, I call it E-10% less!
Profile Pic
altlandf
Sophomore Author Pennsylvania

Posts:248
Points:24,365
Joined:Aug 2003
Message Posted: Jan 5, 2009 3:58:14 PM

It is indeed ethanol. That stuff is crap. There is even a couple pages about ethanol in a GM factory service manual. If there is too much ethanol it does not allow the engine to run right. I just started riding my motorcycle. It ran fine for a couple weeks now it is also having problems running. It is a small bike with one carb on it so it is not hard to clean.
Profile Pic
BeepBeeplookout
Champion Author London

Posts:7,244
Points:434,995
Joined:Dec 2008
Message Posted: Jan 4, 2009 10:05:46 PM

Got me there. I was a BC resident from 1993 to 2004 and it was a local issue. It was the then NDP provincial government that complained and was sued. The acronym is similar, and it's been years since I thought about it.
Profile Pic
gougedQC
Champion Author Montreal

Posts:5,140
Points:69,985
Joined:Apr 2008
Message Posted: Jan 4, 2009 8:30:53 PM

BEEP- are you possibly confusing MTBE with the MMT lawsuit?

Use of MTBE was all but gone by 2000 in Canada. Although it did contaminate ground water, its biggest problem -apparently- was that it made the water smell and taste bad, but was not proven to cause any real health issues.

Ethyl Corp of US sued Canada under NAFTA over banning toxic MMT in gas, Canada caved on that one.

I too have noticed some of the tiny little stickers 'may contain up to 10% ethanol"... pretty sneaky! Here E-10 was always same or higher price!
As you know, I'm against it primarily due to the complete distortions nd mistruths presented by the spin-meisters of the big eth lobby.
Profile Pic
BeepBeeplookout
Champion Author London

Posts:7,244
Points:434,995
Joined:Dec 2008
Message Posted: Jan 4, 2009 8:06:20 PM

Where I live, people used to go to Pioneer stations on purpose because they have ethanol blend at discounted price (being a Farmer/Co-Op company). Now most stations are selling e blends as regular gas. You have to look around if you don't want it. Small stickers have appeared on many pumps stating: May contain up to 10% ethanol. I don't think the average consumer really notices or cares. I guess Canada is exploring our own ethanol content mandates?
BTW the price for 10% blend and (non)regular is equal. There is no discount anymore. But no premium either, the prices move in unison.

[Edited by: BeepBeeplookout at 1/4/2009 9:08:55 PM EST]
Profile Pic
E-Squirrel
Champion Author Orange County

Posts:3,025
Points:824,195
Joined:Feb 2005
Message Posted: Jan 4, 2009 6:26:08 PM

All gasoline sold in California has ethanol added, by law. It replaced MTBE, which was demonstrated to have serious pollution issues. Virtually all of the gasoline sold here is E10, which has some loss of mileage compared with straight gasoline. MTBE blended fuel had a similar loss. It has been so many years now that straight gasoline has been unavailable here, that nobody even thinks about it even any more.

[Edited by: E-Squirrel at 1/4/2009 7:26:42 PM EST]
Profile Pic
GM1954
Champion Author Illinois

Posts:7,950
Points:131,880
Joined:Dec 2004
Message Posted: Jan 4, 2009 10:38:51 AM

"It was general knowledge that nothing is quite so energy packed as regular gas"

Gasoline with MTBE and gasoline with an equivalent amount of ethanol have approximately the same energy content.
Profile Pic
BeepBeeplookout
Champion Author London

Posts:7,244
Points:434,995
Joined:Dec 2008
Message Posted: Jan 4, 2009 10:29:32 AM

"Don't you find it strange that MTBE doesn't produce the same hysteria."

It did up here. MTBE became controversial when it was discovered to be contaminating ground water, in British Columbia. The MTBE companies successfully sued the Provincial Government under NAFTA when the ban of it was attempted. It's use WAS eventually BANNED, but not before our government was forced to pay out our cash. The environmental damages by that product were proved in the end. The ban was the right thing to do.

Nobody round here gave a crap about any millage loss due to ethanol content until recently. Quite the opposite. Until gas prices went so high the last year or two, eth blend fuel was cheaper than straight gas usually by around 10 cent/liter. We all ate it up and loved it. Pioneer is an independent/owner shareholder chain here and they have always blended ethanol in their fuel and that was why it was cheaper than the Big Brand stations. It was general knowledge that nothing is quite so energy packed as regular gas, but I figured the eth would have a beneficial effect of cleaning out your system. Until the prices shot so high last year, any millage loss was not a factor, the pump price was too tempting.
Profile Pic
GM1954
Champion Author Illinois

Posts:7,950
Points:131,880
Joined:Dec 2004
Message Posted: Jan 4, 2009 8:37:25 AM

The addition of a small amount of ethanol is to produce the same effect as MTBE. Ethanol is performing the same function as MTBE. Don't you find it strange that MTBE doesn't produce the same hysteria.

Case in point, MTBE has the same effect on fuel economy as an equivalent mount of ethanol. it's only when people place fuel containing a small amount of ethanol in their tank they see major changes in fuel economy. In theory, a small amount of ethanol added to regular (nonMTBE) gasoline could produce a small difference in fuel economy. But, it's so slight, that you aren't going to be able to detect the difference outside well controlled conditions.

In theory MTBE fuel and the equivalent ethanol fuel should produce identical fuel economy. The point is if you are in an area that required MTBE and now has E5 or E10, the properties of the two fuels are almost identical, including energy content. Most or any differnces seen from swithing from MTBE fuel to ethanol containing fuel are most likely imaginary.

[Edited by: GM1954 at 1/4/2009 9:38:54 AM EST]
Profile Pic
rumbleseat
Champion Author Winnipeg

Posts:23,072
Points:3,551,075
Joined:Oct 2002
Message Posted: Jan 2, 2009 3:42:00 PM

I couldn't find a description telling us what year, make model car was involved, and I didn't see that episode, so, I am merely speculating.

So, could she have been filling with E85 in a car that was not flex? Or perhaps the mechanic didn't realize she wasn't tightening her gas cap properly?

In my case, now that every fill is E10, from every station in Manitoba, my mileage has actually stabilized fractionally HIGHER. My wife's car didn't even notice when her regular stations switched to E10 at the start of 2008. And, in the several years since I purchased my car, the engine light has been on twice, both times it turned out the attendant hadn't tightened the cap far enough, and turning it until it clicked a couple of times made the light go out shortly after.

[Edited by: rumbleseat at 1/2/2009 4:43:56 PM EST]
Profile Pic
PbFootNY
Champion Author New York

Posts:7,934
Points:1,539,660
Joined:Nov 2008
Message Posted: Jan 2, 2009 1:26:15 AM

OceanArcher wrote: "I know that both my cars are much happier running on E-0 fuels ..."

Mine too. Now that I found out I have a choice in my area, I'd have to be pretty hard-up to buy E-10 again.
Profile Pic
SilverStreaker
Champion Author Twin Cities

Posts:12,077
Points:2,244,120
Joined:Mar 2006
Message Posted: Jan 1, 2009 9:46:31 AM

I have had my two non-FFV's up to 35% ethanol with no problems, even with temperatures near 0 degrees F.
Profile Pic
OceanArcher
Champion Author Mississippi

Posts:5,843
Points:1,355,100
Joined:May 2004
Message Posted: Dec 31, 2008 6:51:24 PM

I know that both my cars are much happier running on E-0 fuels ...
Profile Pic
PitbulI
Rookie Author Winnipeg

Posts:91
Points:86,065
Joined:Sep 2004
Message Posted: Dec 31, 2008 6:23:32 AM

I was told a long time ago that I should stay away from ethenol fuel with my old car that I had. This was before ethenol was in most gas. Turns out, I've noticed lately that same type of Car I haven't seen on the road much at all lately and those things were almost bulletproof.
Topic is locked Back to Topics